Diversification, not just S&P 500, is what Permanent Fund needs

Those claiming the Permanent Fund must be doing something wrong because it has not matched the gains of the S&P 500 in the past few years are missing something.

Aside from acting as if perfect hindsight is a roadmap for the future, they are also blind to the need for diversification, which lowers the risk during those periods when specific targets, including the S&P 500, collapse in value.

Read More
Dermot Cole Comments
Sure-fire plan to preserve the Permanent Fund

Keeping the Permanent Fund permanent means reducing the amount we withdraw from it each year.

Instead of taking our 5 percent a year, put a schedule in place to reduce it to 4.5 percent by 2033. Keeping more money in the fund is the best way to improve the chances of future growth, a lesson we should have learned years ago from the Norwegians.

Read More
Dermot Cole Comments
Permanent Fund structure needs overhaul

At a 20-year reunion in 1976 of delegates to the Alaska Constitutional Convention, Katherine Nordale asked one of the convention's key advisers, John Bebout, what he thought of the plan to create the Alaska Permanent Fund that year.

She said she was shocked to hear him say, "You are establishing a fourth branch of government."

She later wrote Rep. Clark Gruening, a key legislator who helped create the rules for the new fund, to warn him against allowing the enterprise to exercise too much control over the state.

"Unless it is managed very carefully and vigilant scrutiny is exercised every step of the way, the people of Alaska may reap little benefit, but millionaires may be created to the detriment of the general welfare of Alaska," she wrote Gruening.

Read More
Dermot Cole Comments
AIDEA pressured consultant to revise 'independent' study on Red Dog finances

I now believe that the $250,000 “independent” study has been kept secret in part because the consulting firm did not denounce the theory that the Red Dog mine and its transportation system might have been built without a state subsidy.

If a subsidy was not needed, that would mean that AIDEA cannot take credit for all of the economic output generated by that mine and that AIDEA’s economic benefits would be trimmed by billions or tens of billions. We will know if I am right if the Senate Resources Committee succeeds in getting AIDEA to release the “independent” 2024 study.

Randy Ruaro, executive director of AIDEA, testified this week that the treatment of Red Dog finances in the 2024 report was a topic that prompted AIDEA to require that Northern Economics revise the “independent” study.

Read More
Dermot Cole Comments